On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 10:58 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote: > The question is has anyone, with Maildir and the INDEX= on NFS (i.e. > dovecot.index and dovecot.index.cache, set mail_nfs_index to no.
How much worse is the mail_nfs_index=yes? Last I heard it made hardly a difference. > If so, > was it better to turn maildir_copy_preserve_filename to on or did it > help to turn if off. That shouldn't make a noticeable performance difference. If it's "yes" it does one more uidlist lookup, but pretty much always the uidlist is already in memory in any case so it doesn't matter. > The other question is did you play with turning off > atime updates or changing the acmin* values? Dovecot doesn't care about atimes, so feel free to disable them. > I figure that the worst that can happen is that the dovecot.index.cache > file will become corrupt, and dovecot will then rebuild it. It's not the worst that can happen, but index file errors are probably more likely than other errors..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
