Works like a charm now!!
Just a thought though, as you have to store the password in the form
{CRAM-MD5}xxxxxxxxx to actually get that and not the default_pass_sheme
would it not be better to have an 'extra' field that could override
default_pass scheme
if it existed instead?
That way it would also be possible to have plaintext passwords
with {} in them and not have to sanitize that.
Anyway, thank you for the quick fix...
-Roger
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Actually the problem was that auth-worker didn't know about the
> mechanism. This should fix it:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/3fcfe8d316b6
>
>
