Timo Sirainen schrieb:
I don't really understand why you're having these dbox problems. If you
use the same hierarchy separator with dbox and maildir, their behavior
should be almost identical.
Hi Timo, with tb it isnt,
i. e. i wasnt able to delete folder
before using tb-extra-mailbox-sep with tb
this makes me real wonder, is this the normal behavior?
( deletion worked from a telent session, so it must be tb stuff )
the subscription behaves also not equal too with tb,
which might depend on tb-extra-mailbox-sep
but thats more a cosmetical issue
it might some config other problem at my test setup so
its a pitty that it seems that dbox is not widly in use
so comparing to others is hard
i like the concept of dbox, in my test i was the only format which makes
a shared namespace possible with folder named like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so i will like to use it in the future.
I will prefer a layout like having
/usr/local/virtual/example.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED] layout on the filesystem
which can be used with postfixadmin
so i can use namespace like
namespace shared {
separator = /
prefix = "users/"
location = dbox:/usr/local/virtual/%d/
inbox = no
list = yes
subscriptions = yes
hidden = no
}
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = ""
location = dbox:/usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/
inbox = yes
subscriptions = yes
list = yes
}
and perhaps ( location might change cause by other layout, to make
public not to apear in shared )
namespace public {
separator = /
prefix = "public/"
location dbox:/usr/local/virtual/%d/public/
inbox = no
list = yes
subscriptions = yes
hidden = no
}
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
