El Miércoles, 2 de Julio de 2008 a las 13:50, Charles Marcus escribió: > On 7/2/2008, Mark Zealey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer > > Wow... good idea for disclaimers (I hate them)...
IANAL, but: It's not only that we all hate them; also they are questionable in a legal point of view. They are based on: - "It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender" Yeah; I got the message, so I'm the addresee. No point here. And my telephatic powers are down now, so I can't know if it's been an error or not. - " delete this message from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any reliance upon its contents" Well, you sent it to me, so it's mine now. Sending a message to me doesn't give you the power to tell me what should I do; otherwise, I could say something like "send me all the files in your hard disk so I can verify you save no copy of this messages" or even "send me 1000$". - Confidentially Under spanish law, I have to SIGN a contract BEFORE I access to the confidential content. No contract, no confidentially. They can not show me some content and, later, tell me it was confidential. Some interesting articles about this: - in spanish: http://www.iabogado.com/esp/blogcfm/1/2007/12/Los-avisos-de-confidencialidad-en-los-correos-esos-engendros-jurdicos.cfm - in english: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ And yes, I'm really tired of this messages... Aaaaaaaaaagur. -- Joseba Torre. CIDIR Bizkaia.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
