On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:02 +0200, Anders wrote: > Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 11:12 +0200, Anders wrote: > >> Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> > >>> Right, that helped me to reproduce it. Fixed: > >>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/cb1c6c942768 > >> Hi again. > >> > >> That fixed my testcase as well, but now I just got another report of a > >> mail with an epoch date. > >> > >> It turns out that I can still get in trouble if running the > >> send_fetch_test script concurrently, with eventual output like this: > >> > >> 2008-05-23 10:54:27.123649 Got valid RFC822.SIZE 1104: 1 (UID 1255 FLAGS > >> () INTERNALDATE "01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 +0000" RFC822.SIZE 1104) > > > > Right.. This should help: > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/d920ec986c34 > > That does not seem to change anything. I have been cherry picking > patches since 1.1.rc4, can you think of other recent changes that I > need? I am waiting for rc6 for a complete upgrade.
Nothing else should be needed. > Note that the size is actually correct now, most of the time, so it is > not exactly the same issue as initially. I could yesterday also reproduce the broken INTERNALDATE pretty easily, but I can't anymore after that patch..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
