Timo Sirainen wrote:
Using IMAP protocol for replication has at least two disadvantages:

It occurs to me that there is at least one advantage of putting as much as possible into the imap protocol:

mailclients are kind of a special of replication client. Really they want to be able to do as much as possible of this stuff as possible also... Although clients typically lag a few weeks behind new RFCs being written (grin), I guess the point is that if some of this stuff is available via IMAP or an IMAP extension then others might one day use or benefit from it?

Just a thought...

Does a modification to IDLE to monitor more folders help us at all?

Ed W

Reply via email to