Thank you Bill for your quick response.
I´ve already joined the procmail-list but it seems that no ones using it....
I´m already waiting day´s for a response....
You probably need to know that if a process is about to die, hundreds
of the similar processes with the same mail-contents have already been
succesfully delivered.
but there must be a special circumstance that some processes still dies
an the mail get lost.
i have already tried procmail -t (which actually means that procmail
dies softly if so, and the
mail should get requed, but this functions is not working in my case)
==============================================================
Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften - Fachhochschule Rosenheim
University of Applied Sciences
Rechenzentrum
Johannes Grimm
Hochschulstr.1
D-83024 Rosenheim
Tel: +49-8031/805-229
Fax: +49-8031/805-223
http://www.fh-rosenheim.de/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============================================================
Bill Cole schrieb:
At 11:23 AM +0200 4/10/08, Johannes Grimm wrote:
Hi to all out there,
i know this is not the right mailinglist for this issue,
That is correct. See http://www.procmail.org/era/lists.html to find
one more suitable.
but i?m hoping to get maybe here an answer to my problem.
Your problem is a bug in procmail that is brought out by rules that
are not adequately paranoid about their input.
