On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:02 -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote: > Very informative yes, but at the same time it seems to make the same mistake > all people make when writing documentation. There are many assumptions made > that a lot of fundamental knowledge of how mail works is known to the > reader. For example, the term "mbox" is simply used. It's not really > described anywhere (admittedly, that I could find) what mbox is.
mbox and maildir are linked to in several pages, but I haven't bothered to link them everywhere.. There's a "mailbox formats" link in the main page anyway which describes all of them. Feel free to add links to them in all wiki pages you can find.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
