On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 10:16 -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > > I fear that the real problem is in base64_decode, but for now I'm going > > to sleep instead of drowsily being confused by a debugger. > > When I add the attached patch, which just adds two asserts toward the end > of base64_decode(), I can get base64_decode to admit that it advanced the > pos pointer beyond where it should be.
I guess this fixes it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/d81a50101724
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
