also sprach Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.24.1654 +0100]: > It could be a good idea to talk about it first in imap-protocol list to > see if other people have better ideas.
This is a good idea. However, in a thread on the mailtags mailing list, the Mail.app MailTags author raised some concerns with using IMAP keywords for mail tags [0], which need to be addressed/discussed first. Basically, using an RFC821 header to store tags in the message is a considerable contender with a major performance downside, but it would solve the challenge of storing tags locally in a way that *all* mail clients could use. 0. http://lists.madduck.net/pipermail/mailtags/2007-August/000038.html -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] microsoft: for when quality, reliability, and security just aren't that important! spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
