also sprach Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.14.2028 +0200]: >> Well, the whole point of sieve, I believe, is to make it something that an >> admin would want to let arbitrary users modify on their own recognizance, >> and the ability to specify arbitrary programs to run would be just *asking* >> to be hacked. > > Wouldn't a decent, secure alternative to procmail be sieve+amavisd-new?
Except it's not really possible to make amavisd-new do per-user spam filtering. And it's even more of a performance hog. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "all language designers are arrogant. goes with the territory..." -- larry wall spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
