On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 13:45 +0300, Tom Alsberg wrote: > Another wish would be a better form of cascading - subfolders as > subdirectories, instead of this awkward Maildir++ dot-separated > format.
I think this is possible already with CVS HEAD: mail_location = Maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs > Having looked again at the code, this does indeed not seem all that > easy. The code handling the mailbox namespace browsing seems too > tightly integrated with the code handling the mailboxes themselves. Did you look at v1.0 or the CVS HEAD? > I suppose it would be best if those two were separated, so a namespace > module will handle issues like "what subfolders does the folder Foo > have" and "what is the physical path for folder Foo.Bar", while the > mailbox module will handle issues like "what messages are there in > folder whose physical path is mail/.Foo.Bar" and "fetch the message > with UID 117 from the folder whose physical path is mail/.Foo.Bar". > The mailbox access module will query the namespace module to obtain > those paths. This is what mailbox_list and mailbox_storage separation was supposed to do. There is still 1:1:1 with mailbox_list:mail_namespace:mail_storage but I don't think it's too difficult to change that. At least compared to what it's like in v1.0.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
