On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 16:16 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:

> I like this last version better. I will use it instead of my version of
> your other version. It is much cleaner.

Yeah, I thought using the imaplib would be good but apparently not :)

> However, your code still lacks conn.expunge(). My testing shows this is
> necessary (at least if you are using Maildir, I imagine it is even more
> necessary with mbox).

I think I had a reason not to do it. I forgot about that reason and just
do it manually once a while. Heh.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to