On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 07:49 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > The other is single-instance storage... and I don't see a mention of > that anywhere... > > Timo - can you make a guess as to whether or not single-instance > storage > is even a possibility with 2.0?
That'd be a dbox-only feature. I've been thinking about dbox a bit recently. I'll write a separate mail about that sometimes later. Anyway, it's possible that it gets implemented even for v1.1.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
