Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007 schrieb Luigi Rosa: > "It's also not a good idea to build the plugin against self-compiled > Dovecot sources, but then actually use a prebuilt binary package of > Dovecot."
> Why isn't a good idea? In this case there there's a significant probability that either the plugin was compiled against a different dovecot version, using a different compiler than the dovecot build and/or using different shared library versions to link against, each of which can lead to obscure and hard to debug misbehaviour / "bugs", which could be easily avoided. So either use both programs as prepackaged binaries which belong together, or build both yourself from the same sources, using the same compiler and the same library versions. Greetings, Gunter -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Plankton lobbyist: "NUKE THE WHALES!" +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + PGP-verschlüsselte Mails bevorzugt! + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
pgprgV3l78tY2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
