On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 04:06 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote: > You mean dspam as --deamon? Yes, that was the recommendation in the > documentation stating it was highly recommended not to do the other > method. So, yes, my postfix file calls amavisd (for clamscan) which > feeds it back into postfix which then calls dspam.
I don't use --daemon right now, it was crashing too much and losing mail. YMMV. > > Hmm. How did that mail end up in SPAM when it doesn't have a signature? > > I only move mail into SPAM that was classified by dspam as SPAM so hence > > also has a signature. > > > > As I see it, dspam creates its .sig files. I do not believe these are > kept around long term. Therefore, it is possible that the signature file > disappears before one could move something out of SPAM (or into it, but > I don't care about that). Am I misunderstanding something? Well, you control how long the .sig files are kept around. I keep them a week longer than my spam folder contents. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
