I like the solution of remounting. I'm running an extended SMART test on
the drives, but after that I'll give it a shot.

The other option that gets my attention is "stripe=96", but I'm not sure
I understand what that does in a RAID 1 array. Is this another option I
should change?

Hamish

On 27/08/2020 13:15, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hello Hamish,
>
>>   * The commit interval is set to 30 seconds instead of the default 5.
>>   * The data mode is set to writeback
>>   * barrier is set to 0, which, from what I understand, can also
>>     compromise data consistency.
> The NAS is going for maximum performance and never mind the integrity of
> the data.  Could you remind us of the manufacturer.  :-)
>
>> My understanding of these issues from what I read here
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/ext4.html#options
>> is that this effectively disables journaling, and seriously impacts
>> the reliability of the storage system (RAID 1).
> The journal will still be used, but in a way which makes recovery less
> robust.
>
> ext4(5) also describes the options and the defaults of
> ‘data=ordered,barrier=1,commit=5’ are much better.  Certainly normal for
> a database's filesystem, or anything where data loss is to be minimised.
>
> And RAID 1 doesn't help because these options are all about the
> higher-level meaning of the data sent to the mirroring drives so
> assuming the RAID 1 does it's job then you've multiple reliable copies
> of incorrect data.  :-)
>
>> Unfortunately, it is D-Link's scripts that mount the RAID array, so
>> I doubt that I can change the options.
> Look at ‘remount’ in mount(8).  Not as part of binding, but standalone.
> With the right arguments you should be able to change the mount options
> to more sane ones soon after boot, with it ignoring /etc/fstab's
> settings.
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
  Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2020-09-01 20:00
  Check to whom you are replying
  Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ...  http://dorset.lug.org.uk
  New thread, don't hijack:  mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk

Reply via email to