On Sunday, 26 April 2020 14:07:40 BST Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Which they know, as I've already said, so I'd be surprised if there's no
> mechanism to cope. When the laptop gets turned on tomorrow, it will be
> interesting to see what ‘snap refresh --time’ then plans to do.
My earlier post was slightly misleading. For convenience, I posted what I got
from my Desktop, since I was posting from there. The output of the command on
the laptop just now was:
timer: 00:00~24:00/4
last: today at 12:27 BST
next: today at 19:31 BST
I think I did the manual refresh at 12:27.
I'll check first thing tomorrow. The laptop is off now.
> If the laptop is only ever on for 30 minutes at a time then the attempt
> to avoid doing lots of timely things soon after power on might result in
> few of them running time after time?
Exactly and most people wouldn't realise that.
--
Terry Coles
--
Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2020-05-05 20:00
Check to whom you are replying
Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk
New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
