2017-06-08 18:51 GMT+02:00 Sasa Ostrouska <cas...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Eldy,
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy) <
> e...@destailleur.fr> wrote:
>
>> This is very difficult.
>> If we publish a roadmap for future dev, it means someone else is engaged
>> to make it at the stated date. But on Dolibarr project, there is no
>> salaries, only volunteer.
>>
> I would sligtly disagree on this. No matter if is paid or not an organized
> way of make some job is way better than the non organized one, especially
> if you want to do that job in more people. But of course if the job is to
> be done by one sole man than that person also can
> organize its work but it have not to communicate it to any one else. This
> is no matter if you are paid or not to do that job.
> Said this, I would really like to see the exact direction the projcet is
> going, as this will facilitate a lot of things in my opinion.
>
> In my thinking a Roadmap does not necessarily need to be done and finished
> on certain date. Its like living on the road, immagine,
> you start walking without knowing where you want to go or start walking to
> arrive to a first defined stop. This does not mean you have to
> be there on a defined date.
>
> So this means a development roadmap in my point of view would be something
> like a whish list, we can call it also like this. Where all the involved
> people would put their wished features and then contribute to it. By doing
> it in that way for sure will it simplify for new people
> on how to contribute and where to start. Some even further benefit would
> be linking this features with the issues on github for example.
>
> But none of the above force you to finish it on some predefined date, just
> it sits there until it is finished.
>
>
>> And getting a guarantee than a volunteer do a work for a defined date is
>> difficult to get. So only contributions that are received can be included.
>> You can force a developer to work on a feature if you pay for it, but you
>> can't for people that work for free.
>>
>> I do agree, and it is no sense to force people to do anything they do not
> want to do. Especially when they do it for free.
>
>
>> Announcing a roadmap for feature and then say finally, nobody did it so
>> roadmap is not what we said is worse than providing a roadmap of future
>> features
>>
>
> I dont understand what you mean with this.
>


I mean:
There is no sense to announce a Roadmap to define content of version A with
feature x and y if, at the end of the due date of roadmap (so when version
A is released), the feature x and y is not present and instead we have
feature z.


>
>
>> The only thing we can decide in advance is a strategic direction, but not
>> a roadmap of future development not yet done. This may change in the
>> future, the day when developers will be payed to make development. But this
>> way of working is not currently the situation.
>>
>> Ok strategic direction is then what I call a roadmap. Possibly on a wiki
> page or place where people can see which features are wished or somebody is
> working on and where the develop branch is heading. This would be very
> helpful in my opinion to have people not working on the same thing or
> joining to contribute on a certain feature being developed.
>

For the moment strategic direction is only announced during meeting in
devcamps.
We must find time to have it published differently. ... But well, there is
so many other priorities...


>
> I also understand that this adds another layer of work, but I think there
> is plenty of tools out there which could help with this.
>
> Just my thoughts and for sure I am not trying to push the work in some
> direction or other.
>
> Rgds
> Saxa
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-06-08 15:09 GMT+02:00 Sasa Ostrouska <cas...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Is there also a roadmap for a development ? I mean, maybe would it be
>>> useful to plan in advance what should come into
>>> the next development. How is this done today by the dev comunity ? It is
>>> something is traced along the time line somewhere
>>> in irc or other communication channel or is it simply free and decided
>>> by anybody who want to contribute.
>>>
>>> For example if I want a certain feature I have to do what to make it
>>> included in the next development release ?
>>>
>>> Dont get me wrong I do not want to change the way you work, just would
>>> like to understand it better.
>>>
>>> I have not looked on the wiki deeply to see if there is some kind of
>>> page what should come in the next release.
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>> Saxa
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Sasa Ostrouska <cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy) <
>>>> e...@destailleur.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Take a look at bottom of page  ;-)
>>>>> https://wiki.dolibarr.org/index.php/Category:RoadMap
>>>>>
>>>>> However, only major version are recorded.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ops :) nice.
>>>> Rgds
>>>> Saxa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-06-08 12:28 GMT+02:00 Sasa Ostrouska <cas...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy) <
>>>>>> e...@destailleur.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dolibarr developers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A maintenance release has been published for branch 5 (v5.0.3) and 4
>>>>>>> (v4.0.6).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, the beta of Dolibarr version 6 is officialy started.
>>>>>>> No new features will be added from PR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As usual, "started development" can be continued to be finished and
>>>>>>> stable for final release. Work on not stable modules are also still 
>>>>>>> opened
>>>>>>> because such modules won't be visible by end users.  Among works
>>>>>>> already started and that are qualified to continue to push non bug fix 
>>>>>>> PR,
>>>>>>> we may find:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - work on advanced accountancy (double party) module to finish/make
>>>>>>> stable changes done during development period,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - new variant module
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - work on look and feel standardization
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - code to make online payment process standardized (this include
>>>>>>> work on module "stripe").
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - translation changes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - changes required to allow package generations
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Please do not send new feature PR during this beta period, but take
>>>>>>> time to test and debug the version 6.0 beta (currently into branch 
>>>>>>> develop*.
>>>>>>> Dedicated branch for v6 will be created when version will be more
>>>>>>> stabilized)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, architecture, re-engineering, or best practice code
>>>>>>> enhancements will be discarded during this period. Instead any help is
>>>>>>> welcome to fix all opened bug: See https://github.com/Dolibar
>>>>>>> r/dolibarr/issues
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More information on what a "freeze" mean: https://wiki.dolibarr.or
>>>>>>> g/index.php/Category:RoadMap
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Version 6.0 beta period should be shorter as usual. It has a very
>>>>>>> good compatibility behavior with external modules, so you can already 
>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>> your external modules are still working with this version, even if 
>>>>>>> freeze
>>>>>>> is done in few days only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Changelog into develop branch does not contains for the moment
>>>>>>> list of new features, but you can read it to get information on what was
>>>>>>> changed and may need attention of external developers or upgraders.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More information on what a "maintenance version" mean:
>>>>>>> https://wiki.dolibarr.org/index.php/Category:RoadMap
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laurent Destailleur, aka Eldy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/+LaurentDestailleur-Open-So
>>>>>>> urce-Expert/
>>>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Destailleur.Laurent
>>>>>>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/eldy10
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the information Eldy, I was thinking why not use the wiki
>>>>>> to make the ChangeLog , this is a good practice you can see in the 
>>>>>> Inkscape
>>>>>> community. Something like this http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/
>>>>>> index.php/Release_notes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rgds
>>>>>> Saxa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
>>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> EMail: e...@destailleur.fr
>>>>> Web: http://www.destailleur.fr
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/+LaurentDestailleur-Open-So
>>>>> urce-Expert/
>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Destailleur.Laurent
>>>>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/eldy10
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> * Dolibarr (Project leader): https://www.dolibarr.org (make a
>>>>> donation for Dolibarr project via Paypal: cont...@destailleur.fr)
>>>>> * AWStats (Author) : http://awstats.sourceforge.net (make a donation
>>>>> for AWStats project via Paypal: cont...@destailleur.fr)
>>>>> * AWBot (Author) : http://awbot.sourceforge.net
>>>>> * CVSChangeLogBuilder (Author) : http://cvschangelogb.sourceforge.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>>>>> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>>> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> EMail: e...@destailleur.fr
>> Web: http://www.destailleur.fr
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------
>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/+LaurentDestailleur-Open-Source-Expert/
>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Destailleur.Laurent
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/eldy10
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------
>> * Dolibarr (Project leader): https://www.dolibarr.org (make a donation
>> for Dolibarr project via Paypal: cont...@destailleur.fr)
>> * AWStats (Author) : http://awstats.sourceforge.net (make a donation for
>> AWStats project via Paypal: cont...@destailleur.fr)
>> * AWBot (Author) : http://awbot.sourceforge.net
>> * CVSChangeLogBuilder (Author) : http://cvschangelogb.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>
>


-- 
EMail: e...@destailleur.fr
Web: http://www.destailleur.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+LaurentDestailleur-Open-Source-Expert/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Destailleur.Laurent
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/eldy10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Dolibarr (Project leader): https://www.dolibarr.org (make a donation for
Dolibarr project via Paypal: cont...@destailleur.fr)
* AWStats (Author) : http://awstats.sourceforge.net (make a donation for
AWStats project via Paypal: cont...@destailleur.fr)
* AWBot (Author) : http://awbot.sourceforge.net
* CVSChangeLogBuilder (Author) : http://cvschangelogb.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev

Répondre à