Hi. I agree, I got used to put "dol_include_once" function whenever I need an inclusion. Even for core modules. Is there any disadvantage doing this ?
Bien cordialement, -- *Maxime KohlhaasConsultant associé**ATM Consulting* *+33 6 33 42 92 43* 2014-08-12 18:14 GMT+02:00 Christophe Battarel < christophe.batta...@altairis.fr>: > Hello everybody, > I wonder if there are reasons to keep require_once lines in dolibarr > except for performance issues. > Because if we replace every require_once by dol_include_once, it will be > possible to customize any script of dolibarr by putting them in the custom > directory with the right pathes. > Best regards > Christophe > > -- > Christophe Battarel > Responsable technique > sarl altairis > Informatique et Web en Grésivaudan > 33 Grande Rue > 38570 Goncelin > 09 52 71 70 96 (appel local) > cont...@altairis.fr > http://www.altairis.fr > > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing list > Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev >
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
