Hi Marcos, I already raised the question and eldy answered he wanted to keep it that way.
If I remember correctly, the rationale was that the tarball should also be usable by developers without an internet connection. I'm still in favor of separating user data (releases) from developer data (code repository) though… Cheers, 2014-08-03 22:13 GMT+02:00 Marcos García <marcos...@gmail.com>: > Hi all: > > I was checking the tarball of Dolibarr 3.5.4 and noticed that the build > directory was present, with the utilities to build a dmg, a debian package, > etc... Some of them are interesting to endusers, but most of them are not. > > Are they present because of a specific reason or because noone questioned > that before? Just curious about it. > > Regards, > > > *Marcos García* > > marcos...@gmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing list > Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev > > -- *Raphaël Doursenaud* Directeur technique (CTO) Expert certifié en déploiement Google Apps <https://gpcsolutions.fr/raphael-doursenaud-google-apps-certified-deployment-specialist> +33 (0)5 35 53 97 13 - +33 (0)6 68 48 20 10 -- <http://gpcsolutions.fr> http://gpcsolutions.fr Technopole Hélioparc 2 avenue du Président Pierre Angot 64053 PAU CEDEX 9 SARL GPC.solutions au capital de 7 500 € - R.C.S. PAU 528 995 921 <https://www.google.com/a/partnersearch/#partner?partner_id=46687933_a0n60000000sqpWAAQ> <http://wiki.dolibarr.org/index.php/Dolibarr_suppliers_France#GPC.solutions>
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
