Yes, the combobox is an easy way to have autocompletion without developing
ajax pages but it must be restricted to limited list. So for contacts it is
not a good choice. Using a dev like we did for product should be the
solution.
Waiting for that, did you try with chrome ? For such problem, it is really
faster than firefox
2013/10/30 Florian Henry <florian.he...@open-concept.pro>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experenting a real performance issue with jquery comobox
> (thridparty and contact)
> I've a data base with more than 20 000 contact, if I click on the
> arrow to display all contact, firefox freeze and put me a message "too long
> execution script continue or stop". I can continue but this is really bad
> user experience. I try to find a solution over internet.
>
> For the search engine I found a piece of code and update
> core/lib/lib_head.js.
> In _create: function() {
> replace
>
> var matcher = new RegExp( $.ui.autocomplete.escapeRegex(**request.term),
> "i" );
> /response( select.children( "option:enabled"
> ).map(function() {
> var text = $( this ).text();
> if ( this.value && ( !request.term ||
> matcher.test(text) ) )
> return {
> label: text.replace(
> new RegExp(
> "(?![^&;]+;)(?!<[^<>]*)(" +
> $.ui.autocomplete.escapeRegex(**request.term) +
> ")(?![^<>]*>)(?![^&;]+;)", "gi"
> ), "<strong>$1</strong>" ),
> value: text,
> option: this
> };
> }) );
>
> By
>
> var matcher = new RegExp(
> $.ui.autocomplete.escapeRegex(**request.term), "i" );
> var select_el = select.get(0); // get dom element
> var rep = new Array(); // response array
> // simple loop for the options
> for (var i = 0; i < select_el.length; i++) {
> var text = select_el.options[i].text;
> if ( select_el.options[i].value && (
> !request.term || matcher.test(text) ) )
> // add element to result array
> rep.push({
> label: text.replace(
> new RegExp(
> "(?![^&;]+;)(?!<[^<>]*)(" +
> $.ui.autocomplete.escapeRegex(**request.term) +
> ")(?![^<>]*>)(?![^&;]+;)", "gi"
> ), "<strong>$1</strong>" ),
> value: text,
> option: select_el.options[i]
> });
> }
> // send response
> response( rep );
>
> It improve perf to 20% on render search. But the problem of down arrow
> click is still here.
>
> Here my question :
>
> 1-At this time it's mostly a client side issue, but do you already
> experience this type of issue ? How did you solve it ?
>
> --
> Florian HENRY
> florian.he...@open-concept.pro
> +33 6 03 76 48 07
> http://www.open-concept.pro
> Twitter : @_Open_Concept_
> Secretaire de l'association Dolibarr
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/**mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev<https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
