https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70026
Rich Bowen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS| |All Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen <[email protected]> --- As with the other issue today, the goal in these documents is to promote best practice. It does not assume that these options will be overridden *by default* but that some server configurations will have overridden them. And so, yes, it is frequently the case, even with 2.4. The reader *does* have a server administrator. It may be themself. It may be someone else. It may be a Puppet script. But there is an administrator. The configuration files may be called something else, but it is, in practice, exceedingly rare for them to be named anything else. In each case, suggestions better phrasing is welcome, but complicating for the sake of the edge case seems unkind to the majority of readers. I'm skeptical that any of these things are actually misleading or confusing in practice. But, for sure, if you have specific rephrasings that you feel will clarify, we are eager to hear those. I don't see the phrase "the FollowSymLinks or SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Options must be enabled" in any of the current versions of the documents. Can you point out where you are seeing this? (I've just rebuilt and republished all recent edits to xml files, just in case something was out of sync with the latest versions.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
