https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66384
--- Comment #6 from Philippe Cloutier <chea...@gmail.com> --- Thank you again Lucien, this is much better now. The paragraph in SSLCertificateFile still contains an implication which is not in the English version: Enfin, il est aussi possible d'ajouter la clé privée du certificat de l'entité finale au fichier de certificat, ce qui permet de se passer d'une directive SSLCertificateKeyFile séparée. Cette pratique est cependant fortement déconseillée. En effet, les fichiers de certificat qui contiennent de telles clés embarquées doivent être définis après les certificats qui utilisent un fichier de clé séparé. "En effet" implies that the [main] reason why the practice is discouraged is the lack of support for any ordering of the directives. I wonder if that is really the case, or if the practice is discouraged for another reason. Ultimately though, this comes from a lack of clarity in the English version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
