Can we -not- do a thing just because it has the word 'security' in its name? Complicating the user experience for what should not be a safe assumption is less than ideal.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:49 PM <bugzi...@apache.org> wrote: > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078 > > Bug ID: 65078 > Summary: Protocol directive vs. Listen directive defaults > Product: Apache httpd-2 > Version: 2.5-HEAD > Hardware: All > OS: All > Status: NEW > Severity: minor > Priority: P2 > Component: Documentation > Assignee: docs@httpd.apache.org > Reporter: cales...@scientia.net > Target Milestone: --- > > Hey. > > In mod/core.html Listen says it defaults to https for 443 and http for > everything else. > > However, the protocol directive claims http would only be assumed for port > 80. > > AFAICS from the sources, these are identical wrt the protocol, so > shouldn't it > also default to https for all but 443? > > If so, please adapt the docs :-) > > Cheers, > Chris. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org > >
