On 01/05/2018 07:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Not sure 18mons after EOL whether we want to declare httpd 2.2 docs > "closed/archived" much like 1.3 and 2.0, in which > case there is no reason to refresh the copyright date. > > Thoughts?
IMHO it should be at least the last copyright update for 2.2. And lets move it to closed/archived like 1.3 and 2.0. Regards Rüdiger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
