It is required, because you don't know what else is in the global configuration outside this example, so it's good to be explicit. On Mar 3, 2016 3:06 AM, "Petr Gajdos" <pgaj...@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:53:33AM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote: > > That example predates the <requireall> directive, so, yeah, there's a > good > > chance it's wrong. Did you try it? > > Yes, see the test flow attached. > > So in case <RequireAll> is missing, file can be created by everyone, > even if this should be forbidden if I understand correctly what the > example should show. In the 2.2 doc, the Satisfy all is not needed > as it is the default, isn't it? > > Petr > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org >
