And, I think, it maybe better to give many separated download packs, each with one language docs.
kajaa ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:18 AM Subject: don't distribute docs with source? > Have we gotten to a point where the docs distribution should be > distributed separately from the source distribution? > > Advantages: > - Less bandwidth used for cvs checkouts and downloads since people get > only what they want. > - People can choose the particular format that they want: > * pure xml > * multi-language html to be viewed through the server > * single-language html that can be viewed using just a browser > * chm > * pdf (?) > - Don't need to keep generated files in cvs, since docs experts can > generate docs releases. (There is still a question about what to do for > the web checkout, since generating files directly onto the live website is > probably not a good idea.) > > Disadvantages: > - May generate more bandwidth usage on httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > because people will be too lazy to download the docs. > - May encourage coders to ignore the docs. > - May be more complicated for end users. > > I don't have a very strong opinion on this, but we should probably think > about it, since it would solve several of the problems we have been > discussing. Of course, any final decision would need to be discussed with > [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well. > > Joshua. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
