Op 11-12-2025 om 21:59 schreef Keith N. McKenna via doc:
Digro,
Thanks for doing that. I know so little about GitHub, that I cannot
answer your final question. I have no real ideae what the directory
review is.
Again thanks
Keith
Keith,
my pleasure.
Review is, as I see it, meant for working copies of the bare files.
If one is ready with translating or reviewing, the resulting file should
be placed in Review.
Preferably with a date attached to it, so that everyone can see which
the latest "worked on" file is.
All the worked on files stay there until the final version is ready.
That way, one can go back to an earlier version, if wanted. After the
final files are processed the files in Review can be deleted, or not :-)
Even initials of the author can be attached to the filename, resulting
in something like:
AOO41CG01-IntroducingCalc_digro_20251212.odt.
That way you will have a chronological list of changes in the worked on
files.
It doesn't really matter where the directory Review is at, either in the
top level directory with ForWiki and the bare files, or in the directory
... Guide
I also thought it might be an idea to rename the top level directory to
Calc41, Writer41.
That way you can place version 4.2 right below it as Calc42 and Writer42
in the same directory ... Guide.
If anyone has other idea's or thinks I'm wrong, please share
My two cents.
--
DiGro
___________________________
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15 (Dutch) and scanned with Ziggo Safe Online (F-Secure)
