On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:22 PM Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net>
wrote:

> Dennis Hamilton wrote:
> > Here's my recommendation.
> >
> >   1.  Do not wait for 4.2.  Use the available energy  and volunteer
> power to advance the Guides for 4.1.
> >
> >   2. Do not ever tie yourself to a speculative schedule not under your
> control.  Not ever.
> >
> > 3. When 4.2 ships or is ready for/in beta, ship a supplement.  There are
> not supposed to be breaking changes.  Probably will though.  Just make a
> quick supplement that can be used in the interim before new 4.2 documents
> are available.  The supplement will also earn feedback for things that
> people notice that are not covered or need to be covered better, and that
> will lead to supplement updates and also improved 4.2 documents.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >   - Dennis
> >
> Thanks for your recommendation Dennis. It was an approach I hadn't
> thought of. I am hoping that I will from the other members of the team
> as well so that we can come to consensus on the path.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org


I agree with Dennis that we should not wait for 4.2. I doubt that the
changes between 4.1.x and 4.2 will cause anything like the number of
revisions needed to update the existing guides to match the current release
and the schedule for 4.2 cannot even be guessed. Let's just plow ahead.
Regards,
Francis

Reply via email to