On 2/22/2021 1:26 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> I thought that since none of the documentation is being distributed with
> the product released by the PMC, i.e. the AOO suite, we could use materials
> with licenses that would not usually be allowed. The Guides are dual
> licensed as GPL 3 (category X)  or CC-by Category B, binary only). I'm not
> sure what "binary" means for documentation but distributing an odt file
> does not seem to meet that criterion. Am I confused?
> Francis
> 
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:27 AM Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 2/22/2021 6:26 AM, Dick Groskamp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2021/02/22 05:13:57, GitBox <g...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> knmc commented on issue #15:
>>>> URL:
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-docs/issues/15#issuecomment-783087015
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Could this be the same one?
>>>>    [](
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=QA/Database&offset=20120801061326&limit=500&action=history
>> )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
>>>> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
>>>> URL above to go to the specific comment.
>>>>
>>>> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
>>>> us...@infra.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The file is here:
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/images/0/02/Base_tutorial.pdf
>>> Just uploaded it a short while ago, since it was missing.
>>>
>>> The SQL that belongs to the file is also there:
>>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/images/1/1d/Base_Tutorial_SQL_code.txt
>>>
>>> Both files mentioned on our wiki: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Base
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>>
>> Digro;
>>
>> I do not believe that this should be distributed from the  mwiki.It is
>> Licensed under the cc-by-nc-sa 3.0 which is a category X license.
>>
>> The other you linked to is the wiki version of the Getting started guide
>> chapter 8 which we already have.I appears that we will have to take that
>> odt file as a starting point and write the rest from scratch.
>>
>> As always other options are both appreciated and encouraged.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>>
>>
Francis;

The second license on the 3.x docs is cc-by version 3.0. This is the
license that was cleared by my inquiry to legal @ as long as they did
not appear in an "Official Release. the license that the Base PDF
carries is cc-by-NC-SA which is a very controversial license as it does
not really define what non-commercial use is and courts around the world
have interpreted it differently.

Given that we could be at risk by having it on the mwiki and definitely
should not have it in our repository.

Regards
Keith




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to