Well, my day yesterday did not go as planned and I did not get back to
this.
What, if anything, needs to be done with respect to Marcia's Debian Install
Guide? I looked through it and everything looks right, though I do not have
the commands all memorized, so there could possibly be an error.  It would
be good to give other people a chance to review documents before posting
them but it is simple enough to review such a short document now. We are
all developing the process and learning as we go, so we should expect some
hiccups.

Keith - do you have any comments on Marcia's email?

Marcia - are you willing to give any more feedback about how to improve
what we are doing?

I am keeping this message on the docs list, since I do not think general
members of the dev list will want to see a detailed discussion. Feel free
to correct me on that.

Francis

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:43 PM F Campos Costero <fjcc.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Sorry, I did not do Reply All.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: F Campos Costero <fjcc.apa...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:41 PM
> Subject: Re: GNU Linux install guide - 6 pages....
> To: <d...@openoffice.apache.org>
>
>
> Marcia,
> I am very sorry you have had a bad experience trying to contribute to the
> docs team. I have just gotten involved myself and my views certainly do not
> represent any official or team perspective. The docs group has made very
> little progress for a long time due to many obstacles but I think there is
> finally a bit of movement with the repair of the MediaWiki extension,  the
> new repository and the decision to make odt the base format, insulating
> most volunteers from technical issues that caused a lot of uncertainty. You
> were certainly a very positive contributor  and I was very much looking
> forward to working with you on the larger documents. Please do continue on.
> I also strongly support your concerns being openly addressed and rectified
> where that is possible.
>
> I want to review the previous emails before saying more, particularly
> because it is getting late for me. I hope that tomorrow I can discuss with
> you and other interested parties how to improve the docs team.
>
> Francis
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:17 PM marcia wilbur <ai...@well.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I realize I did prematurely create a simple installation guide for GNU
>> Linux users without realizing the licensure.
>> This could be fixed.
>> However, I received an email off this list from Keith stating the guide
>> was not peer reviewed.
>>
>> I wonder, were these guides?
>> http://openoffice-uni.org/
>>
>> this was also posted online.
>>
>> One recommendation - please make the onboarding simple and
>> straightforward for those volunteering in this effort for documentation.
>>
>> I was just trying to be a positive force and influence for this project,
>> but really and am disappointed by the docs team - well, particularly and
>> the continued push to use the old docs, mix method of documentation and as
>> I heard during fosdem = the idea... this project cannot move forward as a
>> current offering - like a corporation
>>
>> I do encourage the docs team to move forward with current useful
>> documentation for the project, working with developers in an effort to
>> drive innovation.
>>
>> I hope you can move forward with these attitudes in a positive manner.
>>
>> Keith, all future communication should be made here.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to