Hello Keith, All, I don't have any proposals at the moment, but one question:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:27:20AM -0000, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Greetings All; > > Now that the proposal is finalized unless there are major objections to > it, I would like to start a disscussion on how do we best implament it. I > see two possible ways to go with it. > > 1. We start fresh and write all new documentation Under the ALV2 license > for 4.2.x and take what is currently on the mwiki for the 4.1.x series and > convert it to Writer files and get it under version control if it is > needed for a possible 4.1.9 Release. > > 2. Start with the already published 3.3 odt documents and upgrade those to > version 4. This could require the work being done outside of the project > made up of the people on doc@ do to the 3.3 docs being under what is > considered a catagory X license and may not be able to be stored in an > Apache repository. > > If we want to go with #2 there is a way around the possible repository > problem. I understand from your words that there are some issues with licensing but I cannot fully understand what is the problem. Could you please make it more explicit? Did you also mention rewriting the docs for AOO 4.2 _from scratch_? I browsed through the archives of this ML until November 2017 but I could not find any information about this issue. Thank you in advance and best regards, -- rigo http://rigo.altervista.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org