It appears that Philip Homburg <pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com> said: >So what does .internal have to make it so special that it warrents its own >RFC? It is reserved by ICANN. That's it. ICANN reserved it for a >specific purpose, but does that warrant special treatment at the protocol >level?
Right. Or to answer the question, no. >But my main requirement is that if we publish a standards track document >then it should not lead to DNSSEC validation errors or have requirements >where mobile DNSSEC validators magically add (negative) trust anchors >depending on which network the device is currently connected to. I'd flip it around. If we think it is important that DNSSEC works if you have subtrees with local anchors or no anchors, we should work on that. Saying "add blah to the root because I think that will keep some validators from returning errors" isn't it. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
