On 5/2/25 20:26, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On May 2, 2025, at 11:03, Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40meta....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
My personal unsupported assumption is that the number
of devices in the "we use the cache but don't believe what it says" camp is
small enough not to matter.
I expect you're right today, but there are definitely some folks in DNSOP who
are trying to change that.
Great! Please start a draft. A major problem that has caused this thread is that there is
disagreement about what a "validating stub resolver" operates, particularly
with respect to configuration.
If one wants validating stubs to be common in the future, it would seem
important not to add more stumbling blocks today.
Saying that .internal being like every other TLD that already does not exist today
"adds a stumbling block" is absurd. Names that don't exist don't exist.
I hear all of you, but do not comprehend.
Could you explain what are the differences between
- internal.
- home.arpa.
- 10.in-addr.arpa.
Please?
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
