Dear authors and WG, There have been substantive IETF Last Call comments once extending the review outside of DNSOP. On my own read of the comments, there are two critical ones:
* Are full-text explanations better or worse from UX or security point of view ? * Should the draft merge/include/... with draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors ? The above comments could cause major changes in the I-D requiring another IETF Last Call. If the authors or DNSOP WG prefer, then the draft can be sent back to the DNSOP WG for more community work. Regards -éric
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
