On May 2, 2025, at 11:03, Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40meta....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > My personal unsupported assumption is that the number > > of devices in the "we use the cache but don't believe what it says" camp is > > small enough not to matter. > > I expect you're right today, but there are definitely some folks in DNSOP who > are trying to change that.
Great! Please start a draft. A major problem that has caused this thread is that there is disagreement about what a "validating stub resolver" operates, particularly with respect to configuration. > If one wants validating stubs to be common in the future, it would seem > important not to add more stumbling blocks today. Saying that .internal being like every other TLD that already does not exist today "adds a stumbling block" is absurd. Names that don't exist don't exist. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
