On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:37 AM Ralf Weber <d...@fl1ger.de> wrote:
> Moin! > > On 19 Mar 2025, at 5:42, Shumon Huque wrote: > > I spoke to Ralf Weber in-person a bit about this draft -- and Ralf, who > is > > clearly not a fan of this draft, is nevertheless fine with letting the > > publication of ns-revalidation proceed in its current form and > designation > > (Standards Track and normative SHOULDs). > > That is correct. Now that does not mean that we can not change the draft > and > after thinking about it a lot over the last couple of days let me give you > my > thoughts and maybe we can come to a common understanding. > > When this draft was started I was the only one questioning the benefits so > I > was and am still grateful that section 8.3 was put in reflecting this. Now > over the last couple of years it seems that more people saw that and now > agree with me and I am also happy about that. > Thank you for your well considered response Ralf. I think 8.3 covers most of what you wanted to see in the doc already. Willem and I will mull over some additional text to contrast the approaches and will be in touch for further discussion. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
