Hi Peter, all,
On 14/02/2025 12:31, Peter Thomassen wrote:
I'd like to understand better what the purpose/aspiration of this draft
is, in particular as it's Standards Track.
What normative protocol specification does it actually make?
To me, the descriptions in the document mainly appear to be a number of
observations how to apply RFC 6781 / 7583 considerations to scenarios
where there are multiple signers. While perhaps useful to spell out
explicitly, it seems that the mechanisms described are "by implication"
of current (DNSKEY and RRSIG presence) requirements rather than "by
originality" of something new.
As such, I would have expected this to be Informational (as are RFC
6781 / 7583). But I might be entirely misunderstanding, hence the question!
The chairs discussed the point you raised, that this is not a normative
specification, but that the draft explains how to apply RFC 6781/7583
considerations to multi-signatory scenarios. We came to the same
conclusion that Informational status is appropriate and have shared this
with the authors.
The intended status of the draft has now been changed to Informational.
We are extending the WGLC until next week (including the IETF for
discussion). All review and feedback is welcome on the mailing list.
Best regards,
Suzanne, Tim and Benno
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
