It appears that Petr � pa� ek <pspa...@isc.org> said:
>> That is NXDOMAIN for everything in the zone and NOERROR for the apex 
>> where (fabricated) SOA and NS records exist.
>
>BIND does the same, and I think it's fine. It has worked like that since 
>2012 (in BIND, by default), so if a protocol police comes after me today 
>I'm going to claim it's barred by the statute of limitations :D
>
>But more seriously. If Joe wants a name which gets semi-reliable 
>NXDOMAIN, perhaps go for nonexistent.invalid? At least it says what you 
>want to do in the name.
>
>No amount of text will _guarantee_ a specific answer on the wide and 
>wild Internet, and a new draft is going to have worse adoption rates 
>than RFC 6761 from 2013.

Now that I think about it some more, I have to agree.  The important bit is 
to keep the queries leaking to the upstream and it does that just fine.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to