Hello Stephane, > On 6 Nov 2024, at 8:40 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer > <bortzmeyer=40nic...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > 1) We already have a mechanism to report this censorship. The security > argument is not convincing since you know your resolver, you choosed > it and you have to trust it, anyway.
What are you referring to? Note that this is not a reporting mechanism; per the document, the intent is to surface it to end users. > 2) The entire idea of a registry of public resolvers open so many > issues that I cannot count them. Specially the mention that IANA can > reject some of them (on which grounds?) The draft specifies it as FCFS, so IANA does not have a discretionary role. It's also not a registry of public resolvers per se; it's a registry of templates for obtaining more information about censorship events related to them. If the name of the registry distracts from that we can adjust. > 3) The problem of censorship information is no specific to public resolvers. Of course it isn't. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try to surface it when it happens there. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
