Yes.  I would like to see deeper consideration of what we are trying to prove 
to whom, to help the reader decide how best to do it.

--Ben
________________________________
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 12:54 PM
To: Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification - 
draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.txt

Ben I think we need to be careful when we say "account" in these situations - 
whose account ? domain owner, service owners, etc. It is an overly overloaded 
term. On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9: 58 AM Ben Schwartz <bemasc@ meta. com>

Ben

I think we need to be careful when we say "account" in these situations - whose 
account ? domain owner, service owners, etc.
It is an overly overloaded term.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:58 AM Ben Schwartz 
<bem...@meta.com<mailto:bem...@meta.com>> wrote:
I think this draft should offer more background on the problem space, 
describing the situations where these DCV patterns are appropriate or 
inappropriate.  In particular, I would like to see text clearly distinguishing 
two patterns:

1. "Domain Control Validation" -> Prove that the owner of this account controls 
this DNS name (by placing a random token in an ephemeral TXT record).


2. "Domain Account Authorization" -> Prove that the owner of the DNS name 
authorizes this account (by placing the account name in a persistent TXT 
record).


I would like to see guidance on how to choose between these two approaches.  Or 
are they really the same approach, distinguished by authorizing ephemeral 
accounts vs. persistent ones?


I think part of this answer is based on what the owner of the service 
requesting the DNS authorizing is requesting is it not?


tim



Resolving this distinction would help to harmonize this draft with 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheth-dns-integration/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheth-dns-integration/__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!5Yl2xyCDxvxBQ-MrGHSkZZlV7YdFb-hMZjvkVZehylQhL4gAOSC3XyxqKNrr5q77Zt5RxCDWeQr3$>

--Ben
________________________________
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com<mailto:tjw.i...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 11:18 PM
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org<mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification - 
draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.txt

All After much badgering, the authors have updated this document, addressing 
very useful comments from Duane Wessels (thank you!) and useful and poignant 
comments from Benjamin Kaduk's secdir review (still work through those). There 
is one
All

After much badgering, the authors have updated this document, addressing very 
useful comments from Duane Wessels (thank you!) and useful and poignant 
comments from Benjamin Kaduk's secdir review (still work through those).

There is one outstanding issue which will be on the agenda in Monday's session.

I urge all to at least read the diffs.

thanks
tim


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>>
Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 4:57 PM
Subject: New Version Notification - 
draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.txt
To: <tjw.i...@gmail.com<mailto:tjw.i...@gmail.com>>



A new version (-06) has been submitted for 
draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.txt<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.txt__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!4F3N6oJhwSkUlFkIIwVJeOm1aOi9yFCo7DDb84erI6z34GLDd4Fx8pcM4XxoRCQ2UUGYm1HciEVl$>
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!4F3N6oJhwSkUlFkIIwVJeOm1aOi9yFCo7DDb84erI6z34GLDd4Fx8pcM4XxoRCQ2UUGYm0IDyzY9$>


The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!4F3N6oJhwSkUlFkIIwVJeOm1aOi9yFCo7DDb84erI6z34GLDd4Fx8pcM4XxoRCQ2UUGYm8fckrOW$>

Diff from previous version:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-06__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!4F3N6oJhwSkUlFkIIwVJeOm1aOi9yFCo7DDb84erI6z34GLDd4Fx8pcM4XxoRCQ2UUGYm6JrDtUE$>

IETF Secretariat.


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to