I would welcome adoption of this draft. I think Grease should be a more widely applied concept. I don't personally like how some fields are now marked ring-fenced as "always zero" and while I have to be realistic we can't reverse course on this I think all bitfields which are multivalued with reserved values should be tested to flow with as-yet unassigned values, regularly.
G On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 3:01 AM Suzanne Woolf <swoolf= 40pir....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > This message starts a Call for Adoption for "Greasing Protocol Extension > Points in the DNS" (see > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huque-dnsop-grease/) > > Meeting materials from discussion of this draft in our first meeting at > IETF 119 (19 March 2024) are linked at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/dnsop/meetings/ > > We’ll run it for the usual two weeks, Sept. 30-Oct. 14. Please comment on > whether you think the WG should adopt the draft, and whether you can > contribute to it (reviewing, sending text, etc.) > > > Thanks, > Suzanne, Tim, and Benno > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
