On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:59:26 -0700 Warren Kumari wrote: >> due to the small amount of entropy provided by UDP port numbers and DNS >> message identifiers, each of which being only 16 bits in size, and both >> likely being in the first fragment of a packet if fragmentation occurs. >> >> s/each of which/both/ >> > > Actually, I think that the original is better; to me "both" makes the > sentence ambiguous (could be read as "UDP port numbers are 16 bit, and DNS > message identifiers are 16 bit" or "added together (both) UDP port numbers > and DNS message identifiers are 16 bits").
That's a good point, thank you, although "each of which being" still sounds strange; shouldn't it be "each being" or "each of which is"? (Just a grammar/usage nit; thanks again for catching the potential semantic issue.) (And apologies if my feedback came at an inconvenient point in the review process.) -- Štěpán _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
