This addresses a gap in the DNSSEC specification.  DS records need to identify 
specific DNSSEC algorithms rather than a set of DNSSEC algorithms.

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-andrews-private-ds-digest-types-00.txt
> Date: 22 July 2024 at 10:05:24 GMT-7
> To: "M. Andrews" <ma...@isc.org>, "Mark Andrews" <ma...@isc.org>
> 
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-andrews-private-ds-digest-types-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mark Andrews and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:     draft-andrews-private-ds-digest-types
> Revision: 00
> Title:    Private DS Digest Types
> Date:     2024-07-22
> Group:    Individual Submission
> Pages:    5
> URL:      
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-andrews-private-ds-digest-types-00.txt
> Status:   
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-private-ds-digest-types/
> HTMLized: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-andrews-private-ds-digest-types
> 
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   When DS records where defined the ability to fully identify the
>   DNSSEC algorithms using PRIVATEDNS and PRIVATEOID was overlooked.
> 
>   This documents specifies 2 DS Algorithm Types which allow the DNSSEC
>   algorithm sub type to be encoded in the DS record.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: ma...@isc.org

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to