I'm not a member of this group, but I just saw the notice about this draft in
the internet-drafts mailing list. FWIW, I'm one of the designated experts for
the TLS registries and have lots of experience with them.
You should add text in the IANA considerations saying that "{THISRFC}" is part
of the references. They will probably do that automatically, but better to have
it explicitly in the document.
Table 1 repeatedly flips "sm" in "Algorithms". I think you should split it into
two tables, each with their own separate discussion paragraphs. The current
scheme merges both sets of changes into one big block, and that's harder for
outsiders to parse. You should also include the URL as a hot-link (sic) when
you mention each registry in this section.
You can simplify the sentences by saying "in these new columns" rather than
enumerating in the text (such as near the bottom of page 5). Similarly, I would
not quote the full 8624 security considerations, just put a per-section link.
Write it once, avoid the risk of things getting out of sync or missing an
update.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
