On Jun 26, 2024, at 13:31, James Mitchell <james.mitch...@iana.org> wrote: > > Please find my comments below.
Thanks for the review, James. These all seem easy to deal with. Of particular note: > Looking ahead to the addition of the PublicKey element, we discussed whether > to publish the PublicKey element for historical TAs and whether we would > remove the PublicKey for future-historical TAs. While we have not formalized > plans, can we assume these are operational decisions to be made by IANA? Absolutely. > If so, does the draft require text to clarify that the PublicKey may be > present for some KeyDigests and that the element may be removed if previously > present? We can add that wording, but it is really up to IANA at any given time how they want to handle historic trust anchors within the given XML syntax. We still look forward to others in the WG commenting in WG Last Call. This draft affects way more than IANA. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
