> I was trying not to cloud the issue in my previous remark, but I might as 
> well add additional fuel to the fire now: should DNS64 itself be deprecated? 
> Once you have 464XLAT then you don't need it at all, and you don't need to 
> pretend to applications that IPv4-only servers have IPv6 addresses.
> 

I would still like the option of having an IPv6 only host. (Which 464XLAT 
doesn’t give).
The DNS64 function could be local to the host. Then we could get rid of DNS64 
in the network. 

Cheers 
Ole

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to