[change of topic] " things that the IETF may not have the final say on."
Possibly true in this case, but not having the final say is very different to "having a say" I would find it interesting to understand the current state of thinking in DNSOP as to whether to DNSSEC-sign the root-servers.net zone. Are there folk with thoughts and opinions on this topic? Geoff > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:45 AM Joe Abley <jab...@strandkip.nl> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Doesn't that text presuppose (a) that the current naming scheme is invariant > and (b) the root-servers.net zone will one day be signed? > > I suggest phrasing that recognises current reality is probably better than > text that speculates about the future, especially when it comes to things > that the IETF may not have the final say on. > > > Joe > > Oh that's a very good point, and does make that assumption. "will be > valuable if root-servers.net is DNSSEC signed" does not make that assumption. > > tim >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
