Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-10: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing all my DICSUSS items and comments. I have updated my ballot to Yes, One last comment left on the new text: If all else fails, the domain owner might have to request the removal of all DS records (e.g., by using the special-value CDS/CDNSKEY RRset specified in [RFC8078] Section 4) and have the transfer performed I think the "e.g." sentence should be removed. This is "in case the dns operator is not cooperating", so in that case one would assume they wouldn't update these records either (and the domain owner would need to go through their registrar website, which would cause the records to be removed at the parent via EPP. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
